Carregant...

Trends in adoption of planting density in rubber smallholdings in the traditional regions of India

The analysis of planting density of rubber in small holdings for the period 2004-2010 indicated multifaceted features over time. In the traditional belt, except in North Kerala, the planting density of new planting was higher than that of replanting. After the release of RRII 400 series in the year...

Descripció completa

Dades bibliogràfiques
Autor principal: T. Siju; S. Veeraputhran; Joby Joseph and K. Tharian George
Format: Printed Book
Publicat: Journal of Plantation Crops 2013,
Matèries:
Accés en línia:http://10.26.1.76/ks/005797.pdf
LEADER 01219nam a22001457a 4500
100 |a T. Siju; S. Veeraputhran; Joby Joseph and K. Tharian George  |9 30612 
245 |a Trends in adoption of planting density in rubber smallholdings in the traditional regions of India 
260 |b Journal of Plantation Crops  |c 2013, 
300 |a  425-427  |b 41(3): 
520 |a The analysis of planting density of rubber in small holdings for the period 2004-2010 indicated multifaceted features over time. In the traditional belt, except in North Kerala, the planting density of new planting was higher than that of replanting. After the release of RRII 400 series in the year 2005, significantly higher planting density was adopted for it in South Kerala. In all other regions, no significant difference in planting density was noticed between RRII 105 and RRII 400 series in the case of new planting, but higher density was adopted for replanting of RRII 105. An inverse relationship was observed between the size of holdings and planting density 
650 |a NATURAL RUBBER  |9 26898 
856 |u http://10.26.1.76/ks/005797.pdf 
942 |c KS 
999 |c 81428  |d 81428 
952 |0 0  |1 0  |4 0  |7 0  |9 73480  |a MGUL  |b MGUL  |d 2016-04-11  |l 0  |r 2016-04-11  |w 2016-04-11  |y KS