טוען...
Adjudication in religious family laws : cultural accommodation, legal pluralism, and gender equality in India /
This book argues that the shared adjudication model in which the state splits its adjudicative authority with religious groups and other societal sources in the regulation of marriage can potentially balance cultural rights and gender equality. In this model the civic and religious sources of legal...
| מחבר ראשי: | |
|---|---|
| פורמט: | Printed Book |
| שפה: | English |
| יצא לאור: |
New Delhi :
Cambridge University Press,
2011.
|
| סדרה: | Cambridge studies in law and society.
|
| נושאים: |
| LEADER | 02333cam a2200313 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 008 | 110111s2011 nyu b 001 0 eng | ||
| 999 | |c 178601 |d 178601 | ||
| 010 | |a 2010054306 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781107023895 (hardback) | ||
| 020 | |a 1107006104 (hardback) | ||
| 039 | |a (OCoLC)696603526 | ||
| 043 | |a a-ii--- | ||
| 082 | 0 | 0 | |a 346.5401/5 |2 22 |
| 100 | 1 | |a Solanki, Gopika, | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Adjudication in religious family laws : |b cultural accommodation, legal pluralism, and gender equality in India / |c Gopika Solanki. |
| 260 | |a New Delhi : |b Cambridge University Press, |c 2011. | ||
| 300 | |a xxxiv, 400 p. ; |c 24 cm. | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Cambridge studies in law and society. | |
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 520 | |a This book argues that the shared adjudication model in which the state splits its adjudicative authority with religious groups and other societal sources in the regulation of marriage can potentially balance cultural rights and gender equality. In this model the civic and religious sources of legal authority construct, transmit and communicate heterogeneous notions of the conjugal family, gender relations and religious membership within the interstices of state and society. In so doing, they fracture the homogenized religious identities grounded in hierarchical gender relations within the conjugal family. The shared adjudication model facilitates diversity as it allows the construction of hybrid religious identities, creates fissures in ossified group boundaries and provides institutional spaces for ongoing intersocietal dialogue. This pluralized legal sphere, governed by ideologically diverse legal actors, can thus increase gender equality and individual and collective legal mobilization by women effects institutional change. | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Domestic relations |z India. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Religion and law |z India. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Legal polycentricity |z India. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Justice, Administration of |z India. | |
| 942 | |c BK | ||
| 830 | 0 | |a Cambridge studies in law and society. | |
| 952 | |0 0 |1 0 |2 ddc |4 0 |6 346_540000000000000_SOL_A |7 0 |9 197895 |a WMS |b WMS |c ST1 |d 2018-06-13 |i 1026 |l 1 |o 346.54 SOL/A |p WMS1026 |r 2019-01-23 |s 2019-01-23 |t 1 |y BK | ||
| 952 | |0 0 |1 0 |2 ddc |4 0 |6 346_540000000000000_SOL_A |7 0 |9 354656 |a WMS |b WMS |c ST1 |d 2019-02-06 |i 853 |l 0 |o 346.54 SOL/A |p WMS853 |r 2019-02-06 |y BK | ||