載入...
Comparative constitutional reasoning
To what extent is the language of judicial opinions responsive to the political and social context in which constitutional courts operate? Courts are reason-giving institutions, with argumentation playing a central role in constitutional adjudication. However, a cursory look at just a handful of con...
其他作者: | , , |
---|---|
格式: | Printed Book |
語言: | English |
出版: |
Cambridge :
Cambridge University Press,
2017.
|
主題: |
書本目錄:
- Introduction: Comparing constitutional reasoning with quantitative and qualitative methods / András Jakab, Arthur Dyevre and Giulio Itzcovich
- The High Court of Australia / Cheryl Saunders and Adrienne Stone
- The Austrian Constitutional Court / Konrad Lachmayer
- The Supreme Federal Tribunal of Brazil / Conrado Hübner Mendes
- The Supreme Court of Canada / Hugo Cyr and Monica Popescu
- The Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic / Zdeněk Kühn
- The European Court of Human Rights / Janneke Gerards
- The European Court of Justice / Giulio Itzcovich
- The French Constitutional Council / Arthur Dyevre
- The German Federal Constitutional Court / Michaela Hailbronner and Stefan Martini
- The Constitutional Court of Hungary / András Jakab and Johanna Frölich
- The Supreme Court of Ireland / Eoin Carolan
- The Israeli Supreme Court / Suzie Navot
- The Constitutional Court of Italy / Tania Groppi and Irene Spigno
- The Constitutional Court of South Africa / Christa Rautenbach and Lourens du Plessis
- The Spanish Constitutional Court / Marian Ahumada Ruiz
- The Constitutional Court of Taiwan / Wen-Chen Chang
- The Supreme Court (House of Lords) of the United Kingdom / Tamas Gyorfi
- The Supreme Court of the United States / Howard Schweber and Jennifer L. Brookhart
- Conclusion / András Jakab, Arthur Dyevre and Giulio Itzcovich.