Between samaritans and states: the political ethics of humanitarian INGOs/

Xehetasun bibliografikoak
Egile nagusia: Rubenstein, Jennifer C.
Formatua: Printed Book
Argitaratua: Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
Gaiak:
Non-governmental organizations-Moral and ethical aspects.
Organizational behavior-Moral and ethical aspects.
Sarrera elektronikoa:https://books.google.co.in/books?id=otfhBQAAQBAJ&pg=PR7&dq=Between+Samaritans+and+states&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjPp8ioybbPAhUP8mMKHXJpCW4Q6AEIHTAA#v=onepage&q=Between%20Samaritans%20and%20states&f=false
Aurkibidea:
  • 1.1.A Cartographic Approach
  • 1.2.A Map of Humanitarian INGO Political Ethics
  • 1.3.Four Ethical Predicaments
  • 1.4.Eight Extant Alternatives
  • 1.5.Democratic, Egalitarian, Humanitarian, and Justice-Based Norms
  • 1.6.Contributions to Existing Literatures
  • 1.7.Scope of the Study, Fieldwork, and Methodology
  • 1.8.Outline of the Book
  • 2.Eight Extant Alternative Approaches
  • 2.1.INGOs as Rescuers
  • 2.2.INGOs as Partners
  • 2.3.INGOs as Agents for their Donors
  • 2.4.INGOs as Agents for their Intended Beneficiaries
  • 2.5.Accountability
  • 2.6.Traditional Humanitarian Principles
  • 2.7.INGOs as Neo-Colonialists
  • 2.8.INGOs as Multinational Corporations
  • 2.9.Conclusion
  • 3.A Map of Humanitarian INGO Political Ethics
  • 3.1.Humanitarian INGOs are Sometimes Somewhat Governmental
  • 3.2.Humanitarian INGOs are Highly Political
  • 3.3.Humanitarian INGOs are Often Second-Best Actors
  • 3.4.Moral Permissions
  • 3.5.Conclusion: Four Ethical Predicaments
  • 4.The Problem of Spattered Hands
  • 4.1.The Distinctiveness of Spattered Hands Ethical Predicaments
  • 4.2.Do No Harm, Complicity, Doctrine of Double Effect, Dirty Hands
  • 4.3.Spattered Hands
  • 4.4.Conclusion
  • 5.The Quandary of the Second-Best
  • 5.1.INGO Advocacy as Non-Electoral Representation
  • 5.2.INGO Advocacy as Equal Partnership
  • 5.3.INGO Advocacy as the Exercise of Power
  • 5.4.Conclusion
  • 6.The Cost-Effectiveness Conundrum
  • 6.1.INGOs' Large-Scale Decisions about Resource Use
  • 6.2.The Need Principle, the Harm Minimization Principle, and the Ethics of Refusal
  • 6.3.Evaluating the Need Principle, the Harm Minimization Principle, and the Ethics of Refusal
  • 6.4.The Ethics of Resistance
  • 6.5.Conclusion
  • 7.The Moral Motivation Tradeoff
  • 7.1.The Standard View and Its Limitations
  • 7.2.An Alternative Approach: The Moral Motivation Tradeoff
  • 7.3.Strategies for Navigating the Moral Motivation Tradeoff
  • 7.4.Conclusion
  • 8.Conclusion: Political Political Ethics
  • 8.1.Bringing the Four Maps Together
  • 8.2.Implications for Donors
  • 8.3.Specifying Democratic, Egalitarian, Humanitarian, and Justice-Based Norms for Humanitarian INGOs
  • 8.4.Toward a Political Political Ethics.

Antzeko izenburuak