Φορτώνει......
Community and Legislation of New Forest Management: A Case Study on Participatory Forest Management Program in Kerala, India
Decentralization and devolution are existing trends in forest management. The transfer of power and authority from the national to local or village levels indicates this. Several factors encourage this trend, such as the local demand for benefits reaped from forests, equity between central and local...
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
|---|---|
| Μορφή: | Printed Book |
| Έκδοση: |
The Asian Scholar
|
| Θέματα: | |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: | http://10.26.1.76/ks/005145.pdf |
| LEADER | 01930nam a22001457a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | |a Yuli Nugroho |9 23786 | ||
| 245 | |a Community and Legislation of New Forest Management: A Case Study on Participatory Forest Management Program in Kerala, India | ||
| 260 | |b The Asian Scholar | ||
| 300 | |b Issue No.6 | ||
| 520 | |a Decentralization and devolution are existing trends in forest management. The transfer of power and authority from the national to local or village levels indicates this. Several factors encourage this trend, such as the local demand for benefits reaped from forests, equity between central and local politics, and democratization. The processes of decentralization and devolution have far-reaching implications for forest management and the livelihood of communities living there. One positive aspect is that forests are now being utilized with greater concern for sustainability and equity. This means greater participation for communities in policy-and decision-making. Moreover, this also means a more equitable distribution of benefits between communities and government. But decentralization also carries significant risks where important requirements are not met. For example, there is a potential at the local level for adopting authority and power in forest management. But the technical skills for proper implementation may be lacking. At the initial phase, there may also be a need for assistance from the central government, whether in budget, staff, or information. This paper analyzes the implementation of forest management from the perspective of stakeholders, looking at the interpretation and understanding of their power, their authority and responsibilities over decentralized and devolved forests. | ||
| 650 | |a ENVIRONMENTAL MOVEMENT |9 23787 | ||
| 856 | |u http://10.26.1.76/ks/005145.pdf | ||
| 942 | |c KS | ||
| 999 | |c 75667 |d 75667 | ||
| 952 | |0 0 |1 0 |4 0 |7 0 |9 67651 |a MGUL |b MGUL |d 2015-11-25 |l 0 |r 2015-11-25 |w 2015-11-25 |y KS | ||