Loading...

TO BE OR NOT TO BE DIASPORIC :Alas, poor India!, I knew her

The essay discusses notions of nationality, diaspora and exile as applied to contemporary Indian writers, especially in a world characterized by economic liberalism, wide migration, and easy international travel, transportation and communication. After arguing that there are special reasons why writ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bruce King
Format: Printed Book
Published: Journal of Postcolonial Writing Vol. 42, No. 2 November 2006, pp. 139-154 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://10.26.1.76/ks/001837.pdf
LEADER 014620000a22001450004500
100 |a Bruce King 
245 |a TO BE OR NOT TO BE DIASPORIC :Alas, poor India!, I knew her 
260 |c 2006 
260 |b Journal of Postcolonial Writing Vol. 42, No. 2 November 2006, pp. 139-154 
520 |a The essay discusses notions of nationality, diaspora and exile as applied to contemporary Indian writers, especially in a world characterized by economic liberalism, wide migration, and easy international travel, transportation and communication. After arguing that there are special reasons why writers are concerned with the past, it mentions a range of views from authors who dislike being categorized by origin to those who regard social change and new abodes within India as forms of diasporas. Recent volumes by a number of poets are examined to show some of the ways in which age, generation, and other personal circumstances can influence whether or not and why a writer feels part of a diaspora. While American-led economic and social liberalism is now a dominant force of globalization and change, both recent and ancient history is filled with the diasporas of peoples, including writers. 
650 |a INTERNATIONALISM NOSTALGIA GLOBALISATION ISLAM HINDU STEREOTYPES MYTHOLOGY MIGRANCY LIBERALISM CAPITALIS 
856 |u http://10.26.1.76/ks/001837.pdf 
942 |c KS 
999 |c 71225  |d 71225 
952 |0 0  |1 0  |4 0  |7 0  |9 63189  |a MGUL  |b MGUL  |d 2015-08-01  |l 0  |r 2015-08-01  |w 2015-08-01  |y KS