Loading...

The Law of Peoples: The Old and the New

John Rawls produced two versions of the law of peoples: an article, published in 1993, and a book, published in 1999. Both versions defend basic human rights as a minimum requirement of a just law of peoples. However, in an apparent effort to strengthen his defense of this requirement, the argument...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Chris Naticchia
Format: Printed Book
Published: Journal of Moral Philosophy 2005; 2; 353 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://10.26.1.76/ks/00841.pdf
LEADER 015230000a22001450004500
100 |a Chris Naticchia 
245 |a The Law of Peoples: The Old and the New 
260 |c 2005 
260 |b Journal of Moral Philosophy 2005; 2; 353 
520 |a John Rawls produced two versions of the law of peoples: an article, published in 1993, and a book, published in 1999. Both versions defend basic human rights as a minimum requirement of a just law of peoples. However, in an apparent effort to strengthen his defense of this requirement, the argument changed. This paper examines the apparent difficulties that forced the changes and maintains that they still do not succeed in justifying basic human rights. The source of the difficulty, I argue, is Rawls's reluctance to impose liberal values on nonliberal societies, and the imposition of such values, I suggest, is unavoidable if basic human rights are to be justified. Hence, if our best attempts to justify basic human rights ultimately show that appeals to liberal values are unavoidable, then we should regard such appeals as no more of an imposition than the expectation that all societies must protect basic human rights. Even more significantly, Arguments in support of basic human rights would also justify international efforts to advance further liberal reforms within nonliberal societies. 
650 |a JOHN RAWLS 
856 |u http://10.26.1.76/ks/00841.pdf 
942 |c KS 
999 |c 70229  |d 70229 
952 |0 0  |1 0  |4 0  |7 0  |9 62193  |a MGUL  |b MGUL  |d 2015-08-01  |l 0  |r 2015-08-01  |w 2015-08-01  |y KS