載入...

Toleration and reciprocity: commentary on Martha Nussbaum and Henry Shue

Rawls's Law of Peoples has not gathered a great deal of public support. The reason for this, I suggest, is that it ignores the differences between the international and domestic realms as regards the methodology of reciprocal agreement. In the domestic realm, reciprocity produces both stability...

全面介紹

書目詳細資料
主要作者: Michael Blake
格式: Printed Book
出版: Politics Philosophy Economics 2002; 1; 325 2002
主題:
在線閱讀:http://10.26.1.76/ks/00837.pdf
LEADER 015140000a22001450004500
100 |a Michael Blake 
245 |a Toleration and reciprocity: commentary on Martha Nussbaum and Henry Shue 
260 |c 2002 
260 |b Politics Philosophy Economics 2002; 1; 325 
520 |a Rawls's Law of Peoples has not gathered a great deal of public support. The reason for this, I suggest, is that it ignores the differences between the international and domestic realms as regards the methodology of reciprocal agreement. In the domestic realm, reciprocity produces both stability and respect for individual moral agency. In the international realm, we must choose between these two values - seeking stable Relations between states, or respect for individual moral agency. Rawls's Law of Peoples ignores the stark nature of this choice by insisting that the only legitimate extension of liberal toleration abroad is the toleration of different forms of political organization. It is this attempt to overcome liberalism's tragic dilemma which, I suggest, has made Rawls's international theory less attractive than his domestic theory. I also suggest that this difficulty is at the base of the further difficulties identified by Henry Shue and Martha Nussbaum in their accompanying essays. 
650 |a JOHN RAWLS LAW PEROPLE INTERNATIONAL TOLERATION DOMESTIC ILLIBERALISM 
856 |u http://10.26.1.76/ks/00837.pdf 
942 |c KS 
999 |c 70225  |d 70225 
952 |0 0  |1 0  |4 0  |7 0  |9 62189  |a MGUL  |b MGUL  |d 2015-08-01  |l 0  |r 2015-08-01  |w 2015-08-01  |y KS