Carregant...

Economics Of Arecanut Cultivation In Kasargod District

A study on the economics of arecanut cultivation in Kasaragod district was conducted during the period 1991-92 to evaluate the costs and returns, capital productivity, resource use efficiency of yielding plantation and the problems of arecanut cultivators. Three stage random sampling was adopted fo...

Descripció completa

Dades bibliogràfiques
Autor principal: Dineshkumar EV
Altres autors: Mukudan K (Guide)
Format: Ph.D Thesis
Idioma:Undetermined
Publicat: Vellanikkara Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Horticulture 1994
LEADER 02047nam a2200181Ia 4500
003 OSt
005 20150917122525.0
008 140128s9999 xx 000 0 und d
082 |a 630.33  |b DIN/EC 
100 |a Dineshkumar EV 
245 |a Economics Of Arecanut Cultivation In Kasargod District 
260 |a Vellanikkara  |b Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Horticulture  |c 1994 
502 |b MSc 
520 3 |a A study on the economics of arecanut cultivation in Kasaragod district was conducted during the period 1991-92 to evaluate the costs and returns, capital productivity, resource use efficiency of yielding plantation and the problems of arecanut cultivators. Three stage random sampling was adopted for the study and the data were collected from a sample of 144 cultivators by personal interview method. Total cost of cultivation for 11 years was estimated to be Rs.107133/- for the district, in terms of 1991-92 prices. The major item of expenditure was human labour constituting about 44.75 per cent of the total cost. Manures and fertilizers accounted for 25.92 per cent and cost on plant protection accounted for 9.27 per cent of the total cost for 11 years. The cost of production per quintal was estimated as Rs.1539/- for the district. Pay back period was found to be 8.91 years. Benefit cost ratio was calculated as 2.29. Net present worth was Rs.95506/- and internal rate of return was calculated to be 27.64 per cent. The factors manures and fertilizers and irrigation were found to have significant influence on the gross income obtained from an arecanut garden. The marginal value product of these inputs were found to be 1.262 and 7.07 respectively. High input costs, serious disease problems and difficulties associated with marketing were some of the general problems faced by the sample farmers.  
700 |a Mukudan K (Guide) 
942 |2 ddc  |c TH 
999 |c 25587  |d 25587 
952 |0 0  |1 0  |2 ddc  |4 0  |6 630_330000000000000_DINEC  |7 0  |9 33591  |a KAUCLV  |b KAUCLV  |c THESES  |d 2014-03-18  |o 630.33 DIN/EC  |p 170632  |r 2014-03-18  |w 2014-03-18  |y TH